Reproducibility of Normal Flex tests in evaluating the flexibility of elderly women
Ronaldo V Varejão1, 2, Helena A Figueira1, 2 (helenafigueira at gmail dot com), Alan A Figueira1, 2, Mario C S C Conceicao1, 2, Rodrigo G S Vale2, Estelio H M Dantas1, 2
1 Euroamerican Network of Human Kinetics (REMH). 2 Laboratory of Biomedical Human Kinetics (LABIMH)/Rio de Janeiro State Federal University (UNIRIO) - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
DOI
//dx.doi.org/10.13070/rs.en.1.1266
Date
2014-12-23
Cite as
Research 2014;1:1266
License
Abstract

Objective: To verify the reproducibility of the Normal Flex set of tests as an instrument for evaluating the flexibility level of elderly women. Sample: Randomly composed of 50 active (n= 30) and inactive (n = 20) elderly women aged 67.15±4.21 years. Methods: Flexibility measurements of cervical spine rotation, shoulder horizontal extension, shoulder abduction, lumbar spine flexion and knees flexion were taken through analogical, digital and radiologic goniometry and by the Normal Flex protocol. Results: The intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) was used to verify the reliability within the same evaluators and between the evaluators. The statistical significance was p<0.05. Significant Pearson correlations showed validity for goniometry methods. The intra- and inter-rater reliability results for each joint in analogical goniometry and for Normal Flex varied from r = 0.90-0.99 (p<0.001), showing reproducible results. Conclusion: The reproducibility of Normal Flex as a method of evaluating flexibility of elderly women was confirmed.

Introduction

The increase in the elderly population is a challenge to the 21st century [1], affecting structures of the society related to social [2], cultural and economical values [3] [4] [5] [6]. The inevitable population-aging process [7] has consequences in every facet of human life [8] : medical care, familial composition, and political aspect [9].

Concerning the biological changes that occur with the aging process [10] [11], the functional capacity is progressively lost [12] [13] [14]. This process is associated with morphological and functional changes in the muscle system leading to muscle-mass losses plus the reduction of muscle strength and movement velocity as well as the diminishing of flexibility levels [15] [16] [17]. As the joint motion ranges decrease due to enriched connective tissue and reduced muscle fibre elasticity, pathologies related to the osteomioarticular system occur [18] [19].

The physical incapacity can be observed as a result of lack of physical activity and the gait speed [20] [21] and it influences the daily living activities [22] that can profit from being physically active, even in the short term [23] [24], and gaining on flexibility [25].

The Normal Flex is a set of tests, in ordinal scale, designed to measure the flexibility level of an elderly. This set of tests aims to minimize the difficulties faced by health professionals when dealing with large groups of people, ofen in a short amount of time to perform the tests and with a low budget.

The purpose of this study was to verify the reproducibility of Normal Flex in elderly women flexibility evaluation.

Sample and methods
Sample

The sample was composed of 50 elderly women (aged 67.15±4.21 years), 30 active and 20 inactive, all living in Rio de Janeiro city. At the end of the research, a sample loss of nine elderly women was observed: four by death and five by moving abroad.

The inclusion criteria were being a volunteer and over sixty, and the sample was selected by convenience. The exclusion criteria were dwelling in home facilities or having any disability that could compromise the performance of their daily activities.

This research was performed according to the Helsinki declaration [26] procedures and submitted to the Euro-American Net of Human Kinetics Ethical Committee - approved under the protocol # 007/2009.

Data Collection
Anthropometry

Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated clinical scale, with each subject wearing a swimsuit. Height was determined barefoot to the nearest 0.5 cm, using a stadiometer, Filizola® (Brazil) and Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated. Using a Lufkin (USA) metal anthropometric tape, abdomen circumference (AC), waist circumference (WC) and waist hips ratio (WHR) were obtained. All measures for each patient were taken by a single evaluator, in accordance with International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment [27].

Goniometry

The angular test of analogical goniometry utilised was the protocol of the Biometrics and Physiology of Effort Laboratory - LABIFIE [28] following the pattern index of normality with the Maturity Latin-American Development Group (GDLAM) protocol attributions for the elderly [29]. The flexibility level evaluation was performed via joint amplitude measures for the following movements: cervical spine rotation (CSR), horizontal extension of shoulder (HES), shoulder abduction (SA), and lumbar spine flexion (LSF) plus knees flexion (KF). The results were expressed in degrees using the Lafayette steel 360º goniometry instrument (USA).

Normal Flex

The Normal Flex set of tests [30] was adapted to this research [31] resulting in a total of seven movements: Cervical Spine Rotation (CSR); Horizontal Extension of Shoulder (HES); Shoulder Abduction (SA); Lumbar Spine Flexion (LSF) – sitting and standing; Knees Flexion (KF). The measurement of joint amplitude of Normal Flex was performed through radiologic goniometry through 200000WH Salgado & Herman brand (Brazil), monthly calibrated by a specialised technique. The radiological goniometry was chosen because it is considered the gold standard of flexibility evaluation. An x-ray professional accompanied by the physical educator in charge photographed with x-ray the Normal Flex execution, and then compared with each joint movement evaluated by the analogical goniometry in order to properly verify the reproducibility of the studied set of tests.

The data were collected over four days by two different evaluators: one in the first two days and the other evaluator in other two days. Each tested elderly woman performed two attempts of execution of the Normal Flex, and the performance was therefore registered daily. Each evaluator took three trials of measures of each specific joint motion, and the best result of them was chosen.

Statistical Analysis

Data were anaylyzed with SPSS 18.0 for Windows and are presented as mean and standard deviation. The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to verify the sample’s homogeneity as well as the Spearman and Pearson correlation test in the between-variables association. The intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) was used to verify the reliability between the evaluators. The statistical significance was p<0.05.

Results
Descriptive Analysis of Age and Anthropometric Measures

Table 1 presents the anthropometrics characteristics: age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), abdomen circumference (AC), waist circumference (WC) and waist hips ratio (WHR).

Mean Median SD Minimum Maximum SW
Age (years)67.1566.004.2160.0075.000.075
Weight (kg)68.1068.0011.1447.0092.000.978
Height (m)1.571.560.071.451.700.660
BMI27.5527.633.7917.0634.960.432
AC (cm)98.7597.5011.3479.00123.000.152
WC (cm)106.70106.008.4890.00130.000.253
WHR0.920.930.060.801.030.925
Table 1. Descriptive Analysis of Age and Anthropometric Measures. Descriptive Analysis of Age and Anthropometric Measures. SD: standard deviation.

When the sample’s normality was analyzed through the Shapiro-Wilk test (table 1), it was observed that the p-value is superior to 0.05 in every variable, identifying a distribution close to a normal curve according to parameters of age, body mass and body fat percentage.

Descriptive Data of the LABIFIE Analogical Goniometry

The results refer to values measured by both evaluators. Each one performed the measurement for two days in a row. These evaluations were performed at the same time with the same people and at the same joint area. Analysing the results obtained by both evaluators, they were compared to evaluate the joint movement amplitude. The descriptive data for the dependent variables are presented in table 2 together with the Shapiro-Wilk test result that was calculated to verify the variable homogeneity for the movements. The means and the standard deviations with the same evaluators and between the evaluators are very close to each other, which defines their consistence.

Mean Median SD Minimum Maximum p
CSR - 1 A61.3060.0012.1338.0087.000.094
CSR - 2 A61.3561.5014.2335.0093.000.068
CSR - 1 B61.0058.5012.2935.0088.000.228
CSR - 2 B63.3561.5012.8537.0090.000.370
HES - 1 A64.2566.0013.8742.0089.000.446
HES - 2 A65.5560.0013.8345.0099.000.224
HES - 1 B65.3063.0013.9945.00103.000.060
HES - 2 B66.1064.5013.2748.00102.000.088
SA - 1 A122.65114.0023.7597.00178.000.010
SA - 2 A125.20117.5022.2299.00176.000.018
SA - 1 B126.00117.5021.4498.00169.000.008
SA - 2 B126.00119.0023.1294.00172.000.041
LSF - 1 A27.4524.509.2413.0047.000.420
LSF - 2 A27.9527.008.1017.0047.000.221
LSF - 1 B27.1525.007.9415.0047.000.302
LSF - 2 B27.5525.508.7816.0048.000.138
KF - 1 A28.6028.0012.8811.0051.000.238
KF - 2 A28.6524.5013.8210.0048.000.012
KF - 1 B28.6524.5013.8210.0048.000.012
KF - 2 B30.1527.0014.6111.0052.000.020
Table 2. Descriptive Data and Shapiro-Wilk of Analogical Goniometry. Observation: SW = Shapiro-Wilk; CSR = Cervical Spine Rotation; HES = Horizontal Extension of Shoulder; SA = Shoulder Abduction; LSF = Lumbar Spine Flexion; KF = Knees Flexion; 1A = first evaluator on the first day; 2A= first evaluator on the second day; 1B = second evaluator on the first day; 2B = second evaluator on the second day. SD: standard deviation; p: p-value (SW).

3.3. Descriptive Data and Shapiro-Wilk of Radiological Goniometry

The evaluation of the flexibility through the goniometry performed with X - ray is presented in table 3.

Mean Median SD Minimum Maximum p
CSR - 154.6056.505.3043.0063.000.215
CSR - 258.3560.003.7249.0062.000.017
CSR - 361.1063.005.0451.0066.000.002
HES - 161.1561.0015.0842.0098.000.172
HES - 263.6064.5014.6745.0099.000.153
HES - 365.9567.0014.6647.00101.000.187
SA - 1132.85135.0012.36112.00156.000.605
SA - 2132.95127.0018.81104.00169.000.447
SA - 3136.25130.5030.10100.00184.000.012
LSF - 1 stand25.9526.506.9216.0043.000.119
LSF - 2 stand23.1022.507.3013.0042.000.089
LSF - 3 stand20.6020.007.6910.0041.000.020
LSF - 1 sitting30.2028.007.8219.0048.000.006
LSF - 2 sitting28.2026.507.3219.0047.000.006
LSF - 3 sitting26.7023.507.9317.0048.000.010
KF - 131.2528.5013.8714.0058.000.081
KF - 228.0026.5013.5712.0056.000.080
KF - 326.3023.5012.8810.0053.000.133
Table 3. Descriptive Data and Shapiro-Wilk of Radiological Goniometry. Observation: SW = Shapiro-Wilk; CSR = Cervical Spine Rotation; HES = Horizontal Extension of Shoulder; SA = Shoulder Abduction; LSF = Lumbar Spine Flexion; KF = Knees Flexion. 1, 2, 3 refer to the three trials of measures. SD: standard deviation; p: p-value (SW).
Normal Flex Concurrent Validation Process for Group 1

This study was performed with the 30 elderly women that composed Group 1 – the practitioners of physical activity. During the validation process the analogical goniometry was compared with the digital and with radiological goniometry. While attempting to analyze the relationship among these three ways of measuring, every joint was put together during the correlation analysis, rather than analysing each joint motion separately. For this purpose, data obtained by the second evaluator was used because these had the highest mean values for most variables. Pearson product-moment showed high and significant correlation (r=0.99; p<0.001) between analogical and digital goniometry. Moderate and significant correlations were found among the analogical and radiologic (r=0.63; p<0.01). The same values were found when correlating digital and radiologic goniometry. Therefore, evidence of concurrent validity was found for analogical, digital and radiologic goniometry.

Values CSR % SA % HES % LSF % KF % Total %
42790.0413.31343.31653.32790.08758
3310.02480.01136.71136.726.75134
200.026.7620.0310.013.3128
100.000.000.000.000.000
Total3010030100301003010030100150100
Table 4. Frequency Distribution of Normal Flex Values Per Movement. Observation: CSR = Cervical Spine Rotation; HES = Horizontal Extension of Shoulder; SA = Shoulder Abduction; LSF = lumbar Spine Flexion; KF = Knee Flexion.

One reason to explain this finding is the fact that the sample is composed of physically active elderly women, with 60% obtaining a score of 4 (maximum), since it is difficult to correlate both techniques when 92% of the sample obtained scores between 3 and 4.

Analysis of lumbar spine flexion movements

The Normal Flex contains three tests to evaluate the LSF. It could be asked: why are there so many ways to measure approximately the same joint motion? Surely one of these tests would be sufficient to evaluate this? Therefore, it is important to determine if one of these tests could substitute the others. As such, Spearman correlation analysis was performed (table 5) and its significance for the three LSF movements evaluated through Normal Flex with data in an ordinal scale from 1 to 4.

LSF stand1 LSF stand 2
LSF stand 20.39-
LSF sitting0.440.33
Table 5. Correlation between lumbar spine flexion tests.

The correlation observed was moderate and significant (p<0.05). The highest determination coefficient found showed that only 19% of data variability explains the other, which is not enough to confirm the existence of co-linearity between variables.

Each of the other tests - CSR, HES, SA, LSF and KF - tested only a single joint motion and was different from the others. Since they have different measurement goals, it would not be necessary to determine whether co-linearity exists between them.

. Intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis

The intraclass coefficient of correlation (ICC) was high and significant (r>0.90; p<0.001) during intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis for each joint in both analogical and digital goniometry. Analysis of Normal Flex showed that ICC varied from 0.90-0.99, with p<0.001.

Discussion

The Pearson correlation results were higher than 0.90 and p<0.001, for both intra- and inter-raters. Based on these results, both the reliability of the study and the Normal Flex efficacy – significant for p <0.05 - can be confirmed.

The normality parameters are values obtained [32] through specific population samples, varying according to age and sex, in order to enable evaluation of the results obtained in the test as a function of distribution.

Intra-rater reliability is the consistency of measurements performed by a single rater under the same evaluation conditions at different moments [33], while inter-rater reliability refers to agreement among different evaluators for the analogical and the radiological goniometry measurements presented in tables 2 and 3.

In order to prove the validity of a test it must measure what it was designed for [34], showing reliability, stability and internal consistency. Proving the reliability and objectivity of a measure is therefore essential in order to guarantee data consistency, thereby enabling its use in scientific research. These consistent results represent reproducibility, i.e. the excellent degree of agreement for both reliability and objectivity [35]. The validity of a study should be analysed using two different perspectives: internal and external. Internal validity is related to controlling the intervening variable, without which it would be impossible to interpret the results and make any firm conclusion. This validity involves the control of variables for which the researcher can eliminate every hypothesis as explanations for the results obtained. The external variable refers to the generalisation of results for the population in general or for population groups when a sample is used. Yet even if the intervenient variables are controlled and the internal validity guaranteed, there is no certainty that the external validity will also be controlled. In order to achieve external validity or generalisability [36], i.e. whether the results can be reasonably applied to a definable group other than the population in the original study [37], the sampling process must be well conducted. In this study, there was a major concern in controlling all the variables that could interfere in the study results, so that the validation process could be developed properly.

The rapid increase in the elderly population worldwide raises concerns about their functional ability. Physical inactivity is considered a potential factor that aggravates aging problems [38]. The age-related reduction in flexibility – significantly affected by losses in muscle elasticity and joint mobility - is a factor in functional decline [18]. Evidence shows the beneficial effects of preserving physical and functional autonomy throughout aging [39] to protect the elderly population against developing physical disabilities and becoming clinically institutionalised [40]. Therefore, new studies and discussions will contribute to improving professional care for seniors [41]. Thus, the potential impact of this research is significant since it presents a set of tests capable of evaluating the flexibility of elderly women. Moreover, they are simple, feasible, efficient, and do not involve additional costs or equipment.

Conclusion

Considering the results obtained in relation to its applicability, reliability, consistency and validity, the Normal Flex set of tests exhibitedexcellent reproducibility capable of evaluating the flexibility of elderly women.

Perspectives

As aging progresses, flexibility decreases, influencing the autonomy and independence of individuals to perform activities of daily living. Within this framework, the Normal Flex set of tests was created and validated, evaluating joint flexibility in the spine and limbs of elderly individuals. The Normal Flex is non-dimensional, as it does not depend upon instruments, and consists of a set of movements that classify the flexibility level of cervical spine rotation, hip flexion, knee flexion and extension, in addition to shoulder flexion and abduction. This study determined the applicability, reliability, consistency, validity and reproducibility of the Normal Flex, providing sports medicine professionals with a remarkable instrument when dealing with the elderly.

Suggestion

It is suggested that future studies be performed with the Normal Flex for different age groups and in men.

Declarations
Conflict of interest

The authors hereby declare that this research received no financial support and no relationship was involved that could pose conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Dr. Carlos Soares Pernambuco from Universidade Estácio de Sá and Dr. Samaria Cader from University Federal do Estada do Rio de Janiero recommend the article for publication. The article is edited for English by Michael Germain from The Translation Enterprise MC TRADUÇÕES S/S LTDA.

References
  1. Figueira H, Figueira J, Mello D, Dantas E. Quality of life throughout ageing. Acta medica Lituanica. 2008;15(3):169-72.
  2. Figueira H, Figueira O, Figueira A, Figueira J, Giani T, Dantas E. Elderly quality of life impacted by traditional Chinese medicine techniques. Clin Interv Aging. 2010;5:301-5 pubmed
  3. Basu S, Das PK. Socio-economic and health implications of population ageing. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2008;22(1):85-106.
  4. Tureque I. Bangladesh population ageing and life expectancies: 1950-2050. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2008;22(1):119 -26.
  5. van Willigen J, Chadha N. Social networks of old people in India: research and policy. J Aging Soc Policy. 2003;15:109-24 pubmed
  6. Kumar V. Health status and health care services among older persons in India. J Aging Soc Policy. 2003;15:67-83 pubmed
  7. Figueira H, Figueira J, Bezerra J, Dantas E. Old Aged Quality of Life : Brazil - India a Cross-cultural Perspective. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2009;23(1):66-78.
  8. Agrawal G, Keshri K. Morbidity patterns and health care seeking behavior among older widows in India. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94295 pubmed
  9. Abbott K, Bettger J, Hanlon A, Hirschman K. Factors associated with health discussion network size and composition among elderly recipients of long-term services and supports. Health Commun. 2012;27:784-93 pubmed
  10. Figueira HA, Figueira OA, Figueira AA, Figueira JA, Varejão R, Giani TS, et al. Quality of Life of elderly outpatients served by Traditional Oriental Medicine. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2010;24(2):150-6.
  11. Pernambuco C, Borba-Pinheiro C, Vale R, Di Masi F, Monteiro P, Dantas E. Functional autonomy, bone mineral density (BMD) and serum osteocalcin levels in older female participants of an aquatic exercise program (AAG). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56:466-71 pubmed
  12. Parswani M, Sharma M, Bharath S. Home-based behavioral family intervention in dementia : a case illustration. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2008;22(1):14-26.
  13. Ganesh KS, Yadav A, Sajjan BS, Kotian MS. Epidemiology of Disability among Geriatric Population in the Semi Urban Area ofr Mangalore CIty, Karnataka. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2008;22(1):35-42.
  14. Prafulla C. Case study of productive ageing among the rural women. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2008;22(1):62-72.
  15. Kaur M. Age related loss of Hand Grip Strength Among Rural and Urban Brahmin Females. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2008;22(1):53 -61.
  16. Mallikarjuna K, Nishanth K, Bhaskar-Reddy T, Sathyavelu-Reddy K. Alterations of Intra and Extra Mitochondrial Enzyme in the Muscle Fibersof Rat Hind Limbs: Role of Exercise Training under age induced oxidative stress conditions. Indian Journal of Gerontology. 2008; 22(1):1-13.
  17. da Silva Borges E, de Souza Vale R, Cader S, Leal S, Miguel F, Pernambuco C, et al. Postural balance and falls in elderly nursing home residents enrolled in a ballroom dancing program. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59:312-6 pubmed
  18. Dantas EHM, Daoud R, Trott A, Nodari RJ, Conceicao MCSC. Flexibility: components, proprioceptive mechanisms and methods. Biomedical Human Kinetics. 2011;3(1):39-43.
  19. Figueira HA, Vale R, Figueira AA, Figueira OA, Figueira JA, Cader SA, et al. Impact of Traditional Oriental Medicine and Physical Activity on Bone Mineral Density and Quality of Life of Elderly. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 2014;4(7):31-5.
  20. Hardy S, Allore H, Guo Z, Gill T. Explaining the effect of gender on functional transitions in older persons. Gerontology. 2008;54:79-86 pubmed
  21. Momin M, Desai V, Kavishwar A. Study of socio-demographic factors affecting prevalence of hypertension among bank employees of Surat City. Indian J Public Health. 2012;56:44-8 pubmed
  22. Steege J, Blumenthal J. The effects of aerobic exercise on premenstrual symptoms in middle-aged women: a preliminary study. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37:127-33 pubmed
  23. Littbrand H, Lundin-Olsson L, Gustafson Y, Rosendahl E. The effect of a high-intensity functional exercise program on activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial in residential care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1741-9 pubmed
  24. Mafra OdR, SIlva EBd, Giani TS, Neves CEB, Dantas EHM. Hydroxyproline levels in young adults undergoing muscular stretching and neural mobilization. JMB. 2010;29(1):1-5.
  25. Fallah N, Mitnitski A, Searle S, Gahbauer E, Gill T, Rockwood K. Transitions in frailty status in older adults in relation to mobility: a multistate modeling approach employing a deficit count. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59:524-9 pubmed
  26. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, Adopted by the 18th WMA in Helsinki in 1964 and revised by the WMA: last revision in Seoul. 2008.
  27. Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart A, Carter L. International Standards for anthropometric assessment. ISAK: Potchefsroom, South Africa: The International Society for the Advancement of Kim Anthropometric; 2006.
  28. Dantas EHM, Fonseca R, Vale R. O protocolo LABIFIE de goniometria. Revista Treinamento Desportivo. 1997;2(3):21-34.
  29. Varejão RV, Dantas EHM. Índice estabelecido de um padrão de normalidade GDLAM da avaliação da flexibilidade em idosos. Revista Motricidade. 2006;16:64-9.
  30. Piza ESF, Zeferino W. Normal flex. Fitness Perform Journal. 2006;5(3):187-8.
  31. Varejão RV. Adequar a validação de um protocolo adimensional de avaliação da flexibilidade de idosos “Normal Flex”. Paraguay: Universidad Católica“Nuestra Señora de la Asunción; 2011.
  32. Morrow JR, J AW, Disch JG, Mood D. Medida e avaliação do desempenho humano. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2003.
  33. Batterham AMGK. Reliability in evidence-based clinical practice: a primer for allied healthprofessionals. PhysTher Sport. 2003;4:122-28.
  34. Hastad AC. Measurement and evaluation in physical education and exercise science. 3 ed: Alyn& Bacon; 1988.
  35. Acklin M. Behavioral science foundations of the Rorschach test: research and clinical applications. Assessment. 1999;6:319-26 pubmed
  36. Rothwell P. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?". Lancet. 2005;365:82-93 pubmed
  37. Dekkers O, von Elm E, Algra A, Romijn J, Vandenbroucke J. How to assess the external validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:89-94 pubmed
  38. Borba-Pinheiro C, de Alencar Carvalho M, da Silva N, Drigo A, Bezerra J, Dantas E. Bone density, balance and quality of life of postmenopausal women taking alendronate participating in different physical activity programs. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2010;2:175-85 pubmed
  39. Fraga M, Cader S, Ferreira M, Giani T, Dantas E. Aerobic resistance, functional autonomy and quality of life (QoL) of elderly women impacted by a recreation and walking program. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52:e40-3 pubmed
  40. de Noronha Ribeiro Daniel F, de Souza Vale R, Giani T, Bacellar S, Escobar T, Stoutenberg M, et al. Correlation between static balance and functional autonomy in elderly women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52:111-4 pubmed
  41. Alencar NdA, Souza Junior JVd, Aragao JCB, Ferreira MdA, Dantas E. Nivel de atividade fisica, autonomia funcional e qualidade de vida em idosas ativas e sedentarias. Fisioterapia em Movimento. 2010;23:473-81.
ISSN : 2334-1009